The short answer
An hour on an e-MTB usually burns somewhat fewer calories than an hour on a regular mountain bike at the same effort level you would naturally choose, because the motor lowers your heart rate a little. But calories come from effort multiplied by time, and e-MTB rides tend to be longer with more climbing. Over a whole ride, the totals are often similar, and sometimes higher on the e-bike.
Exact numbers depend on your weight, the terrain, the assist mode and how hard you push. Anyone giving you one figure for "calories burned on an e-bike" is guessing.
What the heart-rate studies show
Calories track effort, and heart rate is the easiest way to measure effort on a trail. In a 2019 Brigham Young University study, experienced riders rode the same loop on a regular mountain bike and on a pedal-assist e-MTB. On the e-MTB their average heart rate was about 94 percent of their regular-bike heart rate. Most of the ride on both bikes was spent at a vigorous intensity.
So per minute, the e-MTB took a bit less effort, but not much less. More on the research in is riding an e-bike good exercise?
A simple way to estimate
Exercise scientists estimate energy use with METs, a multiple of your resting energy use. The Compendium of Physical Activities lists general mountain biking at 8.5 METs. A rough calorie estimate is:
calories per hour ≈ METs × your weight in kg
For an 80 kg (176 lb) rider, general mountain biking comes out around 680 calories per hour. For an e-MTB ride, a reasonable working assumption is a somewhat lower figure per hour, depending on how much assist you use. In eco mode on steep terrain you may be close to the regular-bike number. In boost on gentle terrain you will be well under it.
Treat these as ballpark numbers, not measurements.
Why ride length matters more
Here is where e-MTBs often catch up:
- More laps. Riders commonly do two or three climbs where they would do one on a regular bike.
- Longer rides. The motor reduces fatigue, so rides last longer before you call it.
- More rides. Many people ride more often because each ride feels less punishing, which adds up across a week.
A two-hour e-MTB ride at a slightly lower intensity can easily burn more than a one-hour regular ride.
How to measure your own
- Use a heart-rate strap. Wrist sensors struggle on rough trails. A chest strap is much more accurate.
- Compare like with like. Same loop, similar conditions, both bikes if you can.
- Look at the whole ride, not speed. Average heart rate and total time tell you more than distance.
- Do not trust the e-bike display. Some bikes show a calorie figure, but they cannot see your heart rate unless you pair a sensor, and even then it is an estimate.
If you want to burn more on an e-MTB
- Ride in the lowest assist mode that gets you up.
- Add laps instead of riding faster.
- Keep a steady cadence on climbs rather than letting the motor carry you.
- Switch assist off on flat or gentle sections.
The honest bottom line
If calorie burn per minute is your only goal, a regular bike in a hard gear wins. If the goal is to ride more, enjoy it more and keep doing it, the e-MTB often ends up ahead over a month. Either way, you are pedalling.
More pedalling also means more sweat on the climbs, which is why I made the Watts tee: a light tee that dries faster than the shirt you grabbed on the way out.